Paul Krugman discusses the economics of GOP candidate Ron Paul.
Now, itâ€™s still very unlikely that Ron Paul will become president. But, as I said, his economic doctrine has, in effect, become the official G.O.P. line, despite having been proved utterly wrong by events. And what will happen if that doctrine actually ends up being put into action? Great Depression, here we come.
However, this talking point is much more fiction than fact. For starters, as USA Today noted, â€œGingrich was in office for only two of those budget years (fiscal 1998 and 1999). But he continues to claim credit for two balanced budgets that were passed after he left office (fiscal 2000 and 2001).â€ Furthermore, as Citizens for Tax Justiceâ€™s Bob McIntyre wrote, it was actually the 1993 budget, which all Republicans opposed, that laid the groundwork for the balanced budgets that occurred under President Bill Clinton:
“Center for American Progress Director for Tax and Budget Policy Michael Linden has actually found that legislation passed by Gingrichâ€™s House Republicans made the budget picture worse in the 90s, not better. â€œGingrich and his Republican Congress had nothing at all to do with balancing the budget in 1998. In fact, the net effect of their efforts was to make the fiscal situation slightly worse,â€ Linden noted. “
Republicans, such as Karl Rove have questioned the right of the Occupy wall street movement to call themselves the 99%.
Note to Karl: Its basic math
Mathematically, the 99% have been getting screwed slowly over the course of decades.
While the financial industry has grown to be 30% of our GDP.
While our richest got massive tax breaks and loopholes.
While income has stagnated for workers.
The 99% is my people.
And mathematically, they are very likely your people as well.
He might be in the 1%, which says a lot about how fucked up our system is – that a weasel like Rove is well rewarded for his deceit.
Again I have to highlight an occasion where a republican makes sense. Again its Buddy.
“The Mayor of New York City is standing on the wrong side of history. His actions in the midnight hours against the Occupy Wall Street protestors are unjust, uncalled for, and unconstitutional. The First Amendment right of assembly and speech exists to protect America from this kind of government power abuse.”
Republicans have been beating the “too much regulation” drum since they were elected in 2010 (can’t whine about the deficit as much when you control the purse strings).
Is there any validity to it?
Here’s a fact, from bloomberg.
“Obamaâ€™s White House has approved fewer regulations than his predecessor George W. Bush at this same point in their tenures, and the estimated costs of those rules havenâ€™t reached the annual peak set in fiscal 1992 under Bushâ€™s father, according to government data reviewed by Bloomberg News.”
And, further down:
“U.S. Labor Department statistics show the impact of regulations on layoffs has been small.
Of the 7,247 mass layoffs last year — those involving at least 50 workers — 18 were the result of government regulation, according to department data. Of the 3,114 mass layoffs in the first half of this year, 11 were related to government regulation. By comparison, 1,053 mass layoffs were attributed to business demand.”
I’ve never challenged this long running lie much, because I didn’t bother to learn the causes of the financial crisis.
The GOP/Fox/Koch brothers has convinced their moronic followers that Fannie and Freddie, and Barney Frank, Chris Dodd are to blame for the crisis. That, or a 30-year old law and some poor people that got taken advantage of.
Its a problem when the subject isn’t obvious enough that conservatives end up believing Fox “news” lies.
“Fannie and Freddie, which didn’t make subprime loans but did buy subprime loans made by others, were part of the problem. Poor Congressional oversight was part of the problem. Banks that sought to meet CRA requirements by indiscriminately doling out loans to minorities may have been part of the problem. But none of these issues is the cause of the problem. Not by a long shot. From the beginning, subprime has been a symptom, not a cause. And the notion that the Community Reinvestment Act is somehow responsible for poor lending decisions is absurd.”
“There are so many economic ‘misstatements’ being made,” said Jonathan Lanning, a professor at Bryn Mawr who is teaching two introductory economics classes this semester. “And it isn’t confined to any one candidate.”
Salemi called Ron Paul’s rationale for returning to the gold standard “one of the most dangerous ideas put forward by a politician in recent years.”
I don’t know what to make of this.
It’s a $2k piece of art that apparently helps plants grow.
How stupid are conservatives? They think the deficit has grown under Obama. Can you believe that? 1.2 trillion before Obama to half that amount this year means the deficit is growing to mentally ill conservatives. Conservatives have exclusive ownership of the idiot gene.